<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Deciding on Castle or Spring.Net</title>
	<atom:link href="http://benreichelt.net/blog/2007/11/06/deciding-on-castle-or-springnet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://benreichelt.net/blog/2007/11/06/deciding-on-castle-or-springnet/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 22:20:45 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ben</title>
		<link>http://benreichelt.net/blog/2007/11/06/deciding-on-castle-or-springnet/comment-page-1/#comment-1056</link>
		<dc:creator>ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 14:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benreichelt.net/blog/2007/11/06/deciding-on-castle-or-springnet/#comment-1056</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the feedback Alex. I agree with you on the overall design and usability of Windsor, I spent yesterday swapping Windsor out with Spring.Net and it wasn&#039;t as easy to figure out as it should have been.

Unfortunately you hit the nail right on the head - Spring.Net is very well documented and thats a major selling point when making a case for either framework.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the feedback Alex. I agree with you on the overall design and usability of Windsor, I spent yesterday swapping Windsor out with Spring.Net and it wasn&#8217;t as easy to figure out as it should have been.</p>
<p>Unfortunately you hit the nail right on the head &#8211; Spring.Net is very well documented and thats a major selling point when making a case for either framework.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Henderson</title>
		<link>http://benreichelt.net/blog/2007/11/06/deciding-on-castle-or-springnet/comment-page-1/#comment-1055</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Henderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 09:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benreichelt.net/blog/2007/11/06/deciding-on-castle-or-springnet/#comment-1055</guid>
		<description>Personally having worked with both containers, I think the MicroKernel / Windsor architecture in Castle is a lot more flexible / powerful then the spring equivalent... Give both a try obviously, but in my experience the Windsor container is probably one of the most well designed IoC containers written, in any language.

I think the Castle project actually has more &quot;in it&quot; then Spring.Net, especially if you include Contrib - it&#039;s just poorly documented in many cases, or documented in blog posts... Though I haven&#039;t had a play with some of the new features added to spring in the last 6 months.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally having worked with both containers, I think the MicroKernel / Windsor architecture in Castle is a lot more flexible / powerful then the spring equivalent&#8230; Give both a try obviously, but in my experience the Windsor container is probably one of the most well designed IoC containers written, in any language.</p>
<p>I think the Castle project actually has more &#8220;in it&#8221; then Spring.Net, especially if you include Contrib &#8211; it&#8217;s just poorly documented in many cases, or documented in blog posts&#8230; Though I haven&#8217;t had a play with some of the new features added to spring in the last 6 months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

