<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Live.com reaction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://benreichelt.net/blog/2005/11/02/livecom-reaction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://benreichelt.net/blog/2005/11/02/livecom-reaction/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 22:20:45 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: breichelt</title>
		<link>http://benreichelt.net/blog/2005/11/02/livecom-reaction/comment-page-1/#comment-501</link>
		<dc:creator>breichelt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2005 20:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s194721765.onlinehome.us/blog/2005/11/02/livecom-reaction/#comment-501</guid>
		<description>Joshua, portals existed before Googles personalized portal, but nobody used dhtml as well as they have.  the page also loads quickly and is very clean and simple to use.  When google does stuff like this its never a big media hoopla on their part, they just kind of release it and say &quot;here it is, do what you will.&quot;  Whereas with Microsoft, they have a whole launch event and formal press and things like that, basically clamoring for attention, it takes the luster off of something if people have to ask for attention, rather than people just discovering it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joshua, portals existed before Googles personalized portal, but nobody used dhtml as well as they have.  the page also loads quickly and is very clean and simple to use.  When google does stuff like this its never a big media hoopla on their part, they just kind of release it and say &#8220;here it is, do what you will.&#8221;  Whereas with Microsoft, they have a whole launch event and formal press and things like that, basically clamoring for attention, it takes the luster off of something if people have to ask for attention, rather than people just discovering it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://benreichelt.net/blog/2005/11/02/livecom-reaction/comment-page-1/#comment-500</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2005 20:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s194721765.onlinehome.us/blog/2005/11/02/livecom-reaction/#comment-500</guid>
		<description>Why does Google get credit for the personalized portal? I&#039;ve been using my Yahoo for years (with Yahoo! Mail integration).
Google copies just like everyone else. Google created anything new, they&#039;ve just improved on other people&#039;s stuff.  And that isn&#039;t a criticism, its what software developers do. Somehow, people view it as a negative thing when Microsoft does the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does Google get credit for the personalized portal? I&#8217;ve been using my Yahoo for years (with Yahoo! Mail integration).<br />
Google copies just like everyone else. Google created anything new, they&#8217;ve just improved on other people&#8217;s stuff.  And that isn&#8217;t a criticism, its what software developers do. Somehow, people view it as a negative thing when Microsoft does the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: breichelt</title>
		<link>http://benreichelt.net/blog/2005/11/02/livecom-reaction/comment-page-1/#comment-499</link>
		<dc:creator>breichelt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2005 09:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s194721765.onlinehome.us/blog/2005/11/02/livecom-reaction/#comment-499</guid>
		<description>Yes, you can definitely see where they put to use the start.com work, but you&#039;re right Dan, start.com has worked in firefox for awhile, so its weird why live.com wouldn&#039;t.  And, while start.com has been around for awhile, I still dont see why theres all this fanfare around live.com?  When google published their personalized home page, there was little buzz, except for on some blogs, and nobody was saying that it was the greatest thing since sliced bread.

And I agree that the preference between start.com or google is just a preference, at this point you get the same thing regardless of which one you use, I&#039;m a google man, personally :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, you can definitely see where they put to use the start.com work, but you&#8217;re right Dan, start.com has worked in firefox for awhile, so its weird why live.com wouldn&#8217;t.  And, while start.com has been around for awhile, I still dont see why theres all this fanfare around live.com?  When google published their personalized home page, there was little buzz, except for on some blogs, and nobody was saying that it was the greatest thing since sliced bread.</p>
<p>And I agree that the preference between start.com or google is just a preference, at this point you get the same thing regardless of which one you use, I&#8217;m a google man, personally <img src='http://benreichelt.net/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://benreichelt.net/blog/2005/11/02/livecom-reaction/comment-page-1/#comment-498</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2005 08:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s194721765.onlinehome.us/blog/2005/11/02/livecom-reaction/#comment-498</guid>
		<description>&quot;What&#039;s the difference between live.com and start.com ???&quot;

The start.com folks say it&#039;s the same thing on their blog
http://spaces.msn.com/members/startcom/Blog/cns!1pTNqgeSRxwfEFK-lp62aiFQ!480.entry

So Ben, the whole notion that this is a copy of google&#039;s home page is a little off since start has been around for a while.  Although Google made theirs more public over the last few months.  I&#039;ve always thought that start.com looked better than google&#039;s personalized home page.  Probably a personal preference because the functionality is basically the same.

As for the firefox deal, start.com supports firefox.  Crazy.  Not sure what they did to mess that up when moving to live.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;What&#8217;s the difference between live.com and start.com ???&#8221;</p>
<p>The start.com folks say it&#8217;s the same thing on their blog<br />
<a href="http://spaces.msn.com/members/startcom/Blog/cns" rel="nofollow">http://spaces.msn.com/members/startcom/Blog/cns</a>!1pTNqgeSRxwfEFK-lp62aiFQ!480.entry</p>
<p>So Ben, the whole notion that this is a copy of google&#8217;s home page is a little off since start has been around for a while.  Although Google made theirs more public over the last few months.  I&#8217;ve always thought that start.com looked better than google&#8217;s personalized home page.  Probably a personal preference because the functionality is basically the same.</p>
<p>As for the firefox deal, start.com supports firefox.  Crazy.  Not sure what they did to mess that up when moving to live.com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis van der Stelt</title>
		<link>http://benreichelt.net/blog/2005/11/02/livecom-reaction/comment-page-1/#comment-497</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis van der Stelt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2005 03:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s194721765.onlinehome.us/blog/2005/11/02/livecom-reaction/#comment-497</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s the difference between live.com and start.com ???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s the difference between live.com and start.com ???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
