<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hijacking __doPostBack</title>
	<atom:link href="http://benreichelt.net/blog/2005/03/23/hijacking-__dopostback/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://benreichelt.net/blog/2005/03/23/hijacking-__dopostback/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 22:20:45 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://benreichelt.net/blog/2005/03/23/hijacking-__dopostback/comment-page-1/#comment-257</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2005 05:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s194721765.onlinehome.us/blog/2005/03/23/hijacking-__dopostback/#comment-257</guid>
		<description>Very nice site!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice site!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://benreichelt.net/blog/2005/03/23/hijacking-__dopostback/comment-page-1/#comment-256</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2005 22:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s194721765.onlinehome.us/blog/2005/03/23/hijacking-__dopostback/#comment-256</guid>
		<description>Have you played with Remote Scripting techniques at all?  It might be a bit cleaner to do what you&#039;re talking about than posting back (as seems to be the preferred ASP.NET way of doing things).  Remote Scripting allows you to create very tight, interactive, UIs (think GMail; no postbacks, no page refreshes -- responsiveness feels almost like a thick client).

Here are a few links of interest:

http://www.thycotic.com/dotnet_remotescripting.html

http://www.codeproject.com/aspnet/AlvaroRemoteScripting.asp

http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnclinic/html/scripting11122001.asp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you played with Remote Scripting techniques at all?  It might be a bit cleaner to do what you&#8217;re talking about than posting back (as seems to be the preferred ASP.NET way of doing things).  Remote Scripting allows you to create very tight, interactive, UIs (think GMail; no postbacks, no page refreshes &#8212; responsiveness feels almost like a thick client).</p>
<p>Here are a few links of interest:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thycotic.com/dotnet_remotescripting.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.thycotic.com/dotnet_remotescripting.html</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.codeproject.com/aspnet/AlvaroRemoteScripting.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.codeproject.com/aspnet/AlvaroRemoteScripting.asp</a></p>
<p><a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnclinic/html/scripting11122001.asp" rel="nofollow">http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnclinic/html/scripting11122001.asp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://benreichelt.net/blog/2005/03/23/hijacking-__dopostback/comment-page-1/#comment-255</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2005 18:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s194721765.onlinehome.us/blog/2005/03/23/hijacking-__dopostback/#comment-255</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: breichelt</title>
		<link>http://benreichelt.net/blog/2005/03/23/hijacking-__dopostback/comment-page-1/#comment-254</link>
		<dc:creator>breichelt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2005 06:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s194721765.onlinehome.us/blog/2005/03/23/hijacking-__dopostback/#comment-254</guid>
		<description>Geez, sorry, I was just trying to have a discussion, if you are annoyed, just stop reading and commenting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geez, sorry, I was just trying to have a discussion, if you are annoyed, just stop reading and commenting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://benreichelt.net/blog/2005/03/23/hijacking-__dopostback/comment-page-1/#comment-253</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2005 09:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s194721765.onlinehome.us/blog/2005/03/23/hijacking-__dopostback/#comment-253</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know. You&#039;re the one how needs to &quot;hijack&quot; the page to do &quot;asynchronous&quot; calls not me.

BTW, does talking like this pay more?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know. You&#8217;re the one how needs to &#8220;hijack&#8221; the page to do &#8220;asynchronous&#8221; calls not me.</p>
<p>BTW, does talking like this pay more?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: breichelt</title>
		<link>http://benreichelt.net/blog/2005/03/23/hijacking-__dopostback/comment-page-1/#comment-252</link>
		<dc:creator>breichelt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2005 13:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s194721765.onlinehome.us/blog/2005/03/23/hijacking-__dopostback/#comment-252</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t used validators very much, only tried them a few times, does the javascript that they produce run in firefox?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t used validators very much, only tried them a few times, does the javascript that they produce run in firefox?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://benreichelt.net/blog/2005/03/23/hijacking-__dopostback/comment-page-1/#comment-251</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2005 06:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s194721765.onlinehome.us/blog/2005/03/23/hijacking-__dopostback/#comment-251</guid>
		<description>just because it&#039;s called a validator it doesn&#039;t necessarily have to do validation. you can call your method and do the &quot;asynchronous&quot; call you want to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just because it&#8217;s called a validator it doesn&#8217;t necessarily have to do validation. you can call your method and do the &#8220;asynchronous&#8221; call you want to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: breichelt</title>
		<link>http://benreichelt.net/blog/2005/03/23/hijacking-__dopostback/comment-page-1/#comment-250</link>
		<dc:creator>breichelt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2005 07:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s194721765.onlinehome.us/blog/2005/03/23/hijacking-__dopostback/#comment-250</guid>
		<description>Its not necessarily always validation logic that I want to insert, sometimes its opening or closing a window, or refereshing a window, or making an asychronous request.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its not necessarily always validation logic that I want to insert, sometimes its opening or closing a window, or refereshing a window, or making an asychronous request.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://benreichelt.net/blog/2005/03/23/hijacking-__dopostback/comment-page-1/#comment-249</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2005 05:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s194721765.onlinehome.us/blog/2005/03/23/hijacking-__dopostback/#comment-249</guid>
		<description>i just use a customvalidator.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i just use a customvalidator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
