<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Virtual directory woes&#8230;..</title>
	<atom:link href="http://benreichelt.net/blog/2005/02/12/virtual-directory-woes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://benreichelt.net/blog/2005/02/12/virtual-directory-woes/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 22:20:45 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://benreichelt.net/blog/2005/02/12/virtual-directory-woes/comment-page-1/#comment-205</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2005 05:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s194721765.onlinehome.us/blog/2005/02/12/virtual-directory-woes/#comment-205</guid>
		<description>I didnt want to use the GAC, because I dont think the intent of the GAC was to store entire web applications, but rather for commom class libraries you want to share, it would certainly work, and its something we have considered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didnt want to use the GAC, because I dont think the intent of the GAC was to store entire web applications, but rather for commom class libraries you want to share, it would certainly work, and its something we have considered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://benreichelt.net/blog/2005/02/12/virtual-directory-woes/comment-page-1/#comment-204</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2005 02:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s194721765.onlinehome.us/blog/2005/02/12/virtual-directory-woes/#comment-204</guid>
		<description>What about using the the GAC? or am I missing the point?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about using the the GAC? or am I missing the point?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://benreichelt.net/blog/2005/02/12/virtual-directory-woes/comment-page-1/#comment-203</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2005 14:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s194721765.onlinehome.us/blog/2005/02/12/virtual-directory-woes/#comment-203</guid>
		<description>We are sharing web.config files, but thats certainly a limitation that we can work around, I&#039;ll give that a shot, thanks Paul!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are sharing web.config files, but thats certainly a limitation that we can work around, I&#8217;ll give that a shot, thanks Paul!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://benreichelt.net/blog/2005/02/12/virtual-directory-woes/comment-page-1/#comment-202</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2005 14:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s194721765.onlinehome.us/blog/2005/02/12/virtual-directory-woes/#comment-202</guid>
		<description>You can make that virtual directory an IIS application (if you&#039;re not relying on session being shared between the client app and the admin app) and then it will use the assemblies in the admin&#039;s bin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can make that virtual directory an IIS application (if you&#8217;re not relying on session being shared between the client app and the admin app) and then it will use the assemblies in the admin&#8217;s bin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
