<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Smarter, better, browsers (besides Firefox)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://benreichelt.net/blog/2004/12/03/smarter-better-browsers-besides-firefox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://benreichelt.net/blog/2004/12/03/smarter-better-browsers-besides-firefox/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 22:20:45 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://benreichelt.net/blog/2004/12/03/smarter-better-browsers-besides-firefox/comment-page-1/#comment-128</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Dec 2004 11:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s194721765.onlinehome.us/blog/2004/12/03/smarter-better-browsers-besides-firefox/#comment-128</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re actually talking about a smart client, one that can utilize online connections, yet still provide a great user experience, a couple of magnitudes better than DHTML can.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re actually talking about a smart client, one that can utilize online connections, yet still provide a great user experience, a couple of magnitudes better than DHTML can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://benreichelt.net/blog/2004/12/03/smarter-better-browsers-besides-firefox/comment-page-1/#comment-127</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Dec 2004 05:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s194721765.onlinehome.us/blog/2004/12/03/smarter-better-browsers-besides-firefox/#comment-127</guid>
		<description>From what I understand, netscape was ditched in favor of firefox, do you know which version of netscape is the best?  maybe i&#039;ll check it out....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what I understand, netscape was ditched in favor of firefox, do you know which version of netscape is the best?  maybe i&#8217;ll check it out&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://benreichelt.net/blog/2004/12/03/smarter-better-browsers-besides-firefox/comment-page-1/#comment-126</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2004 23:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s194721765.onlinehome.us/blog/2004/12/03/smarter-better-browsers-besides-firefox/#comment-126</guid>
		<description>Did you look at netscape. Apparantly, Netscape uses the best of both worlds (Firefox and IE). Did not check it out myself (am happy with Firefox)...but sure seems to be a good contender for the &#34;smarter, better browser&#34;.
&lt;br&gt;-S</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you look at netscape. Apparantly, Netscape uses the best of both worlds (Firefox and IE). Did not check it out myself (am happy with Firefox)&#8230;but sure seems to be a good contender for the &#38;#34;smarter, better browser&#38;#34;.<br />
<br />-S</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

